the special immigration appeals commission (Siac) ruled on Monday that Qatada should be freed, despite the Home Office saying he continued to pose a […] On 17 January 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) handed down its judgment in Othman (Abu Qatada) v UK. They alleged that the refusal of access to artificial insemination facilities violated Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). The applicant, Mr. Othman, had arrived in the United Kingdom in 1993, having fled Jordan. Last edited on 31 January 2019, at 23:35 Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. The applicant resisted deportation to Jordan to face trial on on terrorism related charges, saying that there was a real risk that the evidence to be presented against him would include evidence obtained by … It was on appeal from the House of Lords cases RB and U (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Secretary of State for the Home Department v OO (Jordan) which were heard in October 2008 and decided on 18 February 2009. 22 1972 UK – USA Extradition Treaty. The HUDOC database provides access to the case-law of the Court (Grand Chamber, Chamber and Committee judgments and decisions, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries from the Case-Law Information Note), the European Commission of Human Rights (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions) The UK Government obtained assurances from Jordan that he would not be subjected to ill-treatment and would be tried fairly by the Jordanian State Security Court. O resisted deportation under Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the ECHR. 23 Vinter and Others v the United Kingdom 2013 ECHR 645. O had been successful in gaining UK asylum, a … See Also – Omar Othman v The United Kingdom ECHR (8139/09, Bailii, [2009] ECHR 855) Statement of Facts. Othman (Abu Qatada) v. United Kingdom was a 2012 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights which stated that under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights the United Kingdom could not lawfully deport Abu Qatada to Jordan, because of the risk of the use of evidence obtained by torture. OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – 8139/09 [2012] ECHR 56 – Read judgment – updated (7/2/2012): Abu Qatada is expected to be released from Long Lartin maximum security jail within days. Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom gave the Court a valuable opportunity to develop more fully its jurisprudence on the question of what constitutes a “flagrant denial of justice”.
In the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom in Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online.
The applicants lodged a complaint against the United Kingdom with the European Court of Human Rights. In the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom In the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online, Editors 2010-01-01 00:00:00 Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 16 (20102011): 397488 YIME In the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), …